C1מתקדם· 205 מילים

קראו את הקטע וענו על השאלות: כלכלת תשומת הלב ומחיריה

access to online service is , has not disappeared; it has merely disguised. user pays attention, platforms , package, and auction to advertisers milliseconds. business model, summarized as attention , has consequences extend beyond marketing. Because scales with engagement, systems we are tuned not accuracy or our -term satisfaction but whatever keeps us scrolling, and decades of psychological outrage, novelty, and splendidly metric. Critics of , it be said, points. Moral panics about media are as as printing , and blaming algorithms conveniently excuse human appetites they serve; newspaper discovered value of indignation smartphone. there is meaningful difference of . newspaper selected sensational stories once ; recommendation system runs millions of experiments per each user, personalizing provocation. Regulators begun to , with proposals ranging from requirements to outright bans engagement-based ranking minors. Whether faster than product remains, , wager.

💡 הקישו על מילה מסומנת כדי לראות את הפירוש

שאלות הבנה

What does the author mean by saying the transaction has been “disguised”?
According to the passage, what are recommendation systems tuned for?
What point do critics of the attention-economy critique make?
What “difference of degree” does the author identify?

עוד קריאה ברמת C1